BY FREDDIE
WILDE (FEATURED COLUMNIST) ON OCTOBER 31, 2013
Five years ago today, a Kevin Pietersen-led England played against a team called the "Stanford
Superstars," which was made up of West Indian cricketers in a Twenty20
match in which the winners would pocket $20 million.
The extravaganza was funded by Allen
Stanford, a multi-millionaire who lived in the Caribbean .
The match was intended to be the first
of five—one played annually—but when Stanford was arrested for fraud and
sentenced to 110 years in prison, the ECB terminated their contract with the
financier and the tournament was consigned to the annals of history.
Five years on from one of the most
embarrassing sagas in English cricket history, B/R takes a look back at the
whole gruesome escapade.
The ECB were keen to enter in a deal with Stanford to
help find a solution to the growing problem of the Indian Premier League.
The T20 league in India offered English players unparalleled riches, and the
ECB were concerned about losing control of their players during the six-week
tournament that clashed with the beginning of the English season.
The Stanford Super Series therefore posed
a handy alternative that offered England 's players the opportunity to earn significant sums of
money in an ECB-endorsed tournament that could be played at a time in the
calendar in which there were few schedule clashes.
In light of what happened later, with
Stanford's arrest, his gratuitous welcome onto the Nursery Ground with his
helicopter at Lord's, the Home of Cricket, was cringeworthy and embarrassing.
Flanked by ECB chairman Giles Clarke and West Indian
cricket legend Sir Gary Sobers, Stanford prowled around the Lord's Nursery
Ground.
He had been involved in West Indian
cricket before the launch of the Stanford Super Series—running the domestic T20
tournament in the Caribbean and putting together a group of "legends"
to endorse his project.
West Indian cricket has a rich heritage.
The fact that legends such as Sobers and Sir Viv Richards were drawn into the
whole facade is a huge shame.
Perhaps the most enduring image of the saga will be
Stanford flanked by cricketing head-honchos and former players, standing tall,
and beaming behind a glass box of $20 million. Whether the money was even real
is unknown, in the light of the fraud scandal, but it was a grotesque show of
wealth and power.
Stephen Brenkley, writing prior to the
tournament in The Independent, was prescient in his assessment of the series:
Of all the short-form matches currently being organised, the conclusion
is easily reached that Stanford Superstars v England is the most offensive. It has no context as a proper
sporting competition, it is neither country versus country, club versus club or
invitation XI versus invitation XI. It is a rococo hybrid. It has money but
nothing else going for it.
When the series eventually got underway, the walking,
talking disaster continued.
The pitches were poor, the cricket was
shoddy and the show was horribly stage-managed. Cricket was Stanford's toy and
he was enjoying playing with it.
Perhaps the most embarrassing moment of
the tournament was when Emily Prior—wife of England wicket keeper Matt Prior—was seen bouncing on the
knee of Stanford. who looked like the cat who had got the cream.
To top the whole thing off, England lost the $20
million match, thus taking home nothing and rendering the initial point of
getting involved unfulfilled.
It wasn't even a close match, with the
Stanford Superstars romping home by 10 wickets. England looked disenchanted, fed up and wholly unimpressed
with the occasion. And who could blame them?
The Stanford Saga should be remembered
as one of the most embarrassing moments in cricket history, and an accurate
reflection of an era dictated to by money and greed.
For a full and open debate on the Stanford Receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/
No comments:
Post a Comment